Myth vs Batas.
Which one is true?
Things Filipinos commonly believe about the law. Some are true. Most are not. Answer each card and the provision behind it appears — no sign-in, and nothing is recorded.
General information, not legal advice. This deck was written by the PhilippineLaws team from the law it cites and checked for accuracy to the best of our knowledge, last on Sep 21, 2026. It has not been reviewed by a lawyer. Read the cited law yourself, and for your own situation talk to a lawyer or the Public Attorney’s Office (PAO).
Every claim in the deck
45 claims across 6 areas of law. Open one to see the answer — or play the cards above first.
Money & Consumer Rights
8An online lending app can send police to arrest you for an unpaid loan.Show the answer
The Constitution is explicit: no person shall be imprisoned for debt. Simply not paying a loan is a civil matter, and the lender's remedy is a collection case, not an arrest. Separate crimes, such as a bounced check or fraud in getting the loan, are a different matter.
1987 Constitution, Art. III, Sec. 20
Read the full answerA store with a 'No return, no exchange' sign can refuse to replace or refund an item that turns out to be defective.Show the answer
The Consumer Act gives you the right to a repair, replacement, refund or price reduction when a product is defective, and any stipulation contrary to those warranty rules has no legal effect. A sign on the wall cannot waive them. What the law does not require is a refund just because you changed your mind about an item that works fine.
RA 7394, Arts. 68 and 100
Read the full answerA store can charge you more at the cashier than the price on the shelf tag.Show the answer
Products offered for retail sale must carry a price tag, and they cannot be sold at a price higher than the one stated on it. Tags also cannot be erased or altered. Violations carry a fine or imprisonment, and a second conviction can cost the store its business permit.
RA 7394, Arts. 81, 83 and 95
Read the full answerA senior citizen can claim the 20% senior discount on top of a store's promo price.Show the answer
When a covered item or service is already on promotional discount, the senior citizen gets either the promo discount or the 20% senior discount, whichever is higher, not both. The store cannot use the promo to deny the senior discount altogether; you simply get the better of the two.
RA 7432, Sec. 4, as amended by RA 9994
Read the full answerA store can refuse your gift check because it has already expired.Show the answer
Gift checks, gift certificates and gift cards bought for money cannot carry an expiry date, and the issuer cannot refuse to honor the unused balance. The law does not cover discount coupons or vouchers, or gift checks from loyalty, rewards or promo programs. A store may also refuse one that was lost, or damaged so badly it cannot be verified, through no fault of the issuer.
RA 10962, Secs. 5 to 7
Read the full answerAn online seller can refuse a refund or replacement for a defective item because you bought it online.Show the answer
Online buyers keep the Consumer Act's remedies: repair, replacement, refund or others when the item is defective, malfunctions, or is lost without your fault. If you choose a replacement or refund, the seller takes the original item back at no cost to you.
RA 11967, Sec. 20
Read the full answerA collection agency or lending app can have the police arrest you for unpaid credit card or personal loans.Show the answer
Under Article III, Section 20 of the 1987 Constitution, no person may be imprisoned for non-payment of debt. Inability to pay a loan or credit card balance is strictly a civil liability, not a crime (unless you issued a bouncing check under BP 22). Debt collectors who threaten police arrest or post public shaming messages violate SEC MC No. 18 (2019) and BSP consumer protection regulations.
1987 Constitution, Art. III, Sec. 20; SEC MC No. 18 (2019)
Read the full answerIf someone accidentally sends money to your GCash or Maya number, you can legally keep and spend it as an honest mistake on their part.Show the answer
Under Article 2154 of the Civil Code (solutio indebiti), anyone who receives money delivered by mistake has a strict legal obligation to return it. Keeping and spending funds after notice constitutes unjust enrichment, and intentional refusal to return money can trigger civil liability or criminal charges under the Revised Penal Code.
Civil Code, Arts. 22 and 2154
Read the full answerHousing & Property
8A landlord can change the locks once you fall behind on rent.Show the answer
Only a court can order you out and only a sheriff can enforce it. Changing locks, cutting utilities or removing your things to force you out is self-help eviction the law does not allow, and depending on the facts you may recover possession through a forcible entry case.
Rules of Court, Rule 70
Read the full answerYou can go straight to court over a dispute with a neighbour in the same barangay.Show the answer
Where both parties live in the same city or municipality, most disputes must go through barangay conciliation first, though the law lists exceptions (for example, urgent cases and offenses punishable by more than one year). A case filed without a Certificate to File Action can be dismissed.
RA 7160, Secs. 408 and 412 (Katarungang Pambarangay)
Read the full answerA tax declaration in your name is enough to prove you own the land.Show the answer
The Supreme Court has repeatedly held that tax declarations are not conclusive evidence of ownership. They show that you claim the land and help prove possession, but a title, deed or other stronger evidence usually decides who owns it. Paying the amilyar does not by itself make the land yours.
Spouses Alde v. Bernal, G.R. No. 169336 (2010)
If you occupy someone else's land for 10 years, it becomes yours.Show the answer
Ten years is enough only with good faith and a just title, such as a sale from someone you reasonably believed was the owner. Without those it takes 30 years of public, peaceful, uninterrupted possession as owner, and occupation by the owner's mere tolerance never counts. Land with a Torrens title, and State land that is not patrimonial, cannot be acquired by prescription at all, however long you stay.
Civil Code, Arts. 1113, 1117-1119, 1134 and 1137; PD 1529, Sec. 47
Read the full answerA landlord can keep your whole security deposit when you move out.Show the answer
A deposit is security, not extra rent. The landlord may keep only what covers unpaid rent, unpaid utility bills, or damage you caused, and must return the rest. For rent-controlled units the deposit is capped at two months, must be kept in a bank, and the interest goes back to you when the lease ends.
RA 9653, Sec. 7; Civil Code, Art. 22
Read the full answerA developer can keep everything you paid once you stop paying your house or lot installments.Show the answer
If you have paid at least two years of installments, the Maceda Law gives you a grace period and, on cancellation, a refund of at least 50% of what you paid, rising after five years up to 90%. Cancellation takes effect only 30 days after notarized notice and full payment of that refund. Paid less than two years? You still get a grace period of at least 60 days.
RA 6552, Secs. 3 and 4
Read the full answerStaying on someone's titled land for 30 years automatically makes the informal settler the legal owner.Show the answer
Under the Torrens system, no title to registered land can ever be acquired through prescription or adverse possession, no matter how many decades the occupant has stayed. A registered title is imprescriptible and indefeasible. While unregistered public land may sometimes be acquired after 20 years under RA 11573, private titled land can never be lost by mere squatter occupation.
PD 1529 (Property Registration Decree), Sec. 47
Read the full answerA landlord can pad-lock the door and seize a tenant's personal property for unpaid rent.Show the answer
Landlords cannot resort to self-help eviction, lockout, or extrajudicial seizure of personal belongings without a valid court judgment. Padlocking a tenant's home or disconnecting electricity unilaterally constitutes Grave Coercion or Unjust Vexation under the Revised Penal Code. The proper remedy is a formal demand letter followed by an action for Unlawful Detainer under Rule 70.
Rules of Court, Rule 70; Revised Penal Code, Art. 286
Read the full answerWork & Employment
8An employer can dismiss you on the spot for serious misconduct.Show the answer
Even where the misconduct is real, dismissal needs two written notices and a genuine chance to be heard. Skip that and the dismissal is procedurally defective, and damages follow.
Labor Code, Arts. 292(b) and 297
Read the full answerYou lose your 13th-month pay if you resign before December.Show the answer
You are entitled to the proportionate amount for the months you actually worked. It forms part of your final pay, which is due within 30 days of separation.
PD 851, Revised Guidelines
Read the full answerMaternity leave is shorter if you deliver normally instead of by caesarean.Show the answer
RA 11210 gives 105 days with full pay regardless of how you delivered. The old distinction between normal and caesarean delivery was removed.
RA 11210, Sec. 3
Read the full answerA mother can transfer part of her maternity leave to the child's father.Show the answer
Up to 7 days, whether or not they are married. Those days sit on top of the 7 days of paternity leave under RA 8187, not inside them.
RA 11210, Sec. 6
Read the full answerAn employer can hold your Certificate of Employment until you finish clearance.Show the answer
DOLE requires the certificate within three days of your request, and the advisory does not make it conditional on clearance, returned equipment, or an ongoing dispute.
DOLE Labor Advisory No. 06-20
Read the full answerA company that closes down always owes separation pay.Show the answer
Closure due to serious business losses carries no separation pay — but the employer has to actually prove the losses. Closure for any other reason owes at least one month's pay or half a month's pay per year of service, whichever is higher.
Labor Code, Art. 298
Read the full answerIf an employee resigns without serving the 30-day notice, the employer can forfeit their entire final pay as an automatic penalty.Show the answer
DOLE Labor Advisory No. 06-20 and Article 116 of the Labor Code strictly prohibit unlawful wage deductions. While short notice can make an employee liable for actual, proven damages directly caused by their departure, an employer cannot arbitrarily confiscate earned salary or pro-rated 13th-month pay as a punitive penalty.
Labor Code, Arts. 116 & 300; DOLE LA 06-20
Read the full answerAn employer can keep a BPO agent or security guard on unpaid floating status indefinitely until a new project becomes available.Show the answer
Article 301 of the Labor Code strictly caps temporary lay-off or floating status at six calendar months. If the employer fails to recall the employee to an equivalent position with equal pay within six months, the employee is deemed constructively dismissed by operation of law and becomes entitled to full separation pay.
Labor Code, Art. 301 (formerly Art. 286)
Read the full answerFamily & Relationships
4After a legal separation you are free to remarry.Show the answer
Legal separation lets you live apart and divides the property, but the marriage stays valid. To remarry you need a declaration of nullity or an annulment (or, in limited cases, a recognized foreign divorce or a divorce under the Code of Muslim Personal Laws), unless your spouse has died.
Family Code, Arts. 55-67
Read the full answerYou can get a protection order from the barangay on the same day you apply.Show the answer
If there is basis, the Punong Barangay (or a kagawad, if the Punong Barangay is unavailable) must issue the Barangay Protection Order on the day you apply, and it is valid for 15 days. A court can also issue a Temporary Protection Order on the day an application is filed, valid for 30 days, which can do considerably more.
RA 9262, Secs. 14 and 15
Read the full answerIf a married couple has lived apart for 5 or 10 years, their marriage is automatically annulled.Show the answer
Philippine law does not recognize automatic divorce or dissolution of marriage based on the passage of time or long-term de facto separation. Remarrying without a final court decree of nullity or annulment constitutes the crime of bigamy under Article 349 of the Revised Penal Code, even if both spouses have lived separate lives for decades.
Family Code, Arts. 35, 36, 40 & RPC Art. 349
Read the full answerEvery registered solo parent automatically receives a ₱1,000 monthly cash subsidy regardless of their salary.Show the answer
Republic Act No. 11861 specifically limits the ₱1,000 monthly cash subsidy to solo parents who earn minimum wage and below, distributed through their LGU's local social welfare office. Solo parents earning above minimum wage are still entitled to 7 days of paid parental leave, scholarship priority, and 10% discounts on infant goods for children under 6, but not the cash subsidy.
RA 11861, Sec. 8(a)
Read the full answerCrime & Online Offences
15Sharing or liking someone else's defamatory post makes you liable for cyberlibel.Show the answer
In Disini v. Secretary of Justice the Supreme Court held cyberlibel applies to the original author, not to people who merely receive and react. Writing your own defamatory comment is a different matter.
RA 10175, Sec. 4(c)(4); Disini v. SOJ (2014)
Read the full answerPolice at a routine highway checkpoint can compel you to open your car trunk or glove compartment.Show the answer
Routine checkpoint inspections are limited to a visual search. Officers cannot compel you to open your trunk, glove box, or bags unless there is probable cause or you freely give consent.
Valmonte v. de Villa, G.R. No. 83988 (1989); Aniag, Jr. v. COMELEC, G.R. No. 104961 (1994)
Read the full answerPolice officers at a routine checkpoint can force vehicle occupants to step out of the car.Show the answer
Not at a purely routine checkpoint. The Supreme Court limits routine checkpoint inspections to a visual look without opening doors or subjecting occupants to a body search, and PNP checkpoint procedures call for visual checks only. It is different where there is probable cause or another lawful ground for a more intrusive search.
Caballes v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 136292 (2002); PNP Operational Procedures
Read the full answerYou may video record or photograph police officers conducting a checkpoint on a public street.Show the answer
No law prohibits recording police officers performing their duties in public. The Anti-Wiretapping Law covers secretly recording private communications, not officers' public acts. Record openly, do not obstruct the checkpoint or cross marked security lines, and comply with lawful instructions.
1987 Constitution, Art. III, Sec. 4; RA 4200, Sec. 1
Read the full answerPolice can arrest a suspect without a warrant several days after a crime was committed under 'hot pursuit'.Show the answer
For a valid 'hot pursuit' warrantless arrest under Rule 113, Sec. 5(b), the offense must have just been committed and the officer must have probable cause based on personal knowledge of facts or circumstances that the suspect committed it. An arrest days later generally requires a warrant from a judge, unless another ground applies, such as the person being an escaped prisoner.
Rules of Court, Rule 113, Sec. 5(b); Pestilos v. Generoso, G.R. No. 182601 (2014)
Read the full answerPolice can interrogate an arrested suspect without a lawyer if the suspect verbally agrees.Show the answer
Under the Constitution and RA 7438, the rights to remain silent and to counsel during custodial investigation can only be waived in writing and in the presence of counsel. A confession obtained in violation of these rights is inadmissible.
1987 Constitution, Art. III, Sec. 12; RA 7438, Sec. 2
Read the full answerA private citizen can lawfully arrest a person caught in the act of committing a crime without waiting for the police.Show the answer
Under Rule 113, Section 5(a), a private person may arrest without a warrant someone who, in their presence, has committed, is actually committing, or is attempting to commit an offense. The person arrested must then be turned over to the nearest police station or jail without unnecessary delay.
Rules of Court, Rule 113, Sec. 5(a)
Read the full answerYou commit Direct Assault or Resisting Arrest if you use reasonable physical resistance to prevent an illegal, warrantless arrest.Show the answer
Direct assault and resisting arrest both require that the officer be 'engaged in the performance of official duties', and an officer making a clearly unlawful arrest may fall outside that. But whether the arrest was unlawful is decided later, officers are presumed to act regularly, and force beyond what is reasonable can still be charged. The safer course is not to resist physically and to challenge the arrest in court.
Revised Penal Code, Arts. 148 and 151
Read the full answerDefaming someone in a private Facebook Messenger group chat cannot be cyberlibel because it was not posted publicly.Show the answer
In Philippine libel law, 'publication' only requires communicating the defamatory statement to a third person other than the offended party. Sending defamatory remarks to others in a group chat can satisfy this requirement.
Revised Penal Code, Art. 353; RA 10175, Sec. 4(c)(4)
Read the full answerDeleting a defamatory social media post before a complaint is filed erases your criminal liability for cyberlibel.Show the answer
Libel is complete once the defamatory statement is published, that is, seen by a third person. Deleting the post or apologizing later does not undo that, though it may help in settlement or on damages. Whether a case succeeds still depends on proof, such as preserved screenshots.
Revised Penal Code, Arts. 353 & 354; RA 10175
Read the full answerThe deadline to file a cyberlibel case is 12 to 15 years, much longer than for ordinary libel.Show the answer
In Causing v. People (2023), the Supreme Court held that cyberlibel prescribes in one year, like ordinary libel, rejecting the longer periods some courts had applied. But the year runs from when the offended party or the authorities discovered the post, so an old post can still lead to a timely case if it was only recently discovered.
Causing v. People, G.R. No. 258524 (October 11, 2023); RPC Arts. 90 and 91
Read the full answerAfter a warrantless arrest, police can keep you at the station for as long as they need to build their case.Show the answer
They must deliver you to the proper judicial authorities within 12, 18 or 36 hours, depending on whether the offense carries a light, correctional or afflictive penalty. An officer who holds you past that commits a crime. You must also be told why you are detained and be allowed to talk to your lawyer at any time.
Revised Penal Code, Art. 125, as amended by EO 272
Read the full answerOnce you pay back the money or settle with the complainant, the criminal case against you is automatically over.Show the answer
A pardon by the offended party does not extinguish criminal liability, except for the few private crimes under Art. 344, and paying back is not among the grounds that end it. Settling can take care of your civil liability and may lead the complainant to desist, but the prosecutor and the court decide whether the case goes on.
Revised Penal Code, Arts. 23 and 89
Read the full answerA 14-year-old who steals can be charged and sent to jail like an adult.Show the answer
A child 15 or under at the time of the offense is exempt from criminal liability and goes through an intervention program instead; those above 15 but under 18 are exempt too unless they acted with discernment. Civil liability for the damage remains, and a child above 12 who commits a serious crime such as murder or rape is placed in a Bahay Pag-asa facility.
RA 9344, Secs. 6 and 20-A, as amended by RA 10630
Read the full answerMall security guards have the legal authority to open and rifle through your closed bag or purse without your consent.Show the answer
Security guards are private personnel, not law enforcement officers with search warrants. Under settled Supreme Court doctrine, visual and non-intrusive inspections (such as using a stick or metal detector) at building entrances are permissible only as a condition for entry; guards cannot forcibly open pockets, rummage through belongings, or conduct invasive body frisks without voluntary consent. If you decline a search, their only lawful recourse is to deny entry.
1987 Constitution, Art. III, Sec. 2
Read the full answerBusiness & Contracts
2A restaurant can keep part of the service charge it adds to your bill.Show the answer
All service charges collected by hotels, restaurants and similar establishments must be distributed in full and equally among the covered workers, excluding managerial employees. The law does not require a service charge; it controls where the money goes when one is collected.
Labor Code, Art. 96, as amended by RA 11360
Read the full answerA purely verbal agreement, with nothing signed, can still be a binding contract.Show the answer
Contracts are perfected by mere consent and bind the parties in whatever form they are made, as long as the essential requisites are present. Some, like a sale of land or a lease longer than a year, cannot be enforced in court without a writing, and a few, like a donation of land, are void without a public document. Put it in writing anyway: it is far easier to prove.
Civil Code, Arts. 749, 1315, 1356 and 1403(2)
Read the full answerPangkalahatang impormasyon lamang ito para sa edukasyon — hindi ito legal advice, at hindi ito sinuri ng abogado. Sinikap naming tama ito ayon sa batas na binanggit, pero para sa sarili mong kaso, kumonsulta sa abogado o sa Public Attorney's Office (PAO).