Zialcita v. PAL
No confirmed citationJanuary 1, 1977
Study material, not legal advice. Written and checked by the PhilippineLaws team to the best of our knowledge; not reviewed by a lawyer. A digest is a summary — the full decision is the authority, so read it before you cite it.
Don't cite this from here. The docket on file (RO4-3-3398) could not be matched to any decision in the library, so it is not shown as a citation above. The case may well be real — find the reported citation before you use it.
Cited for
Anti-Marriage Clause / Discriminatory Policy
Why it matters
The 'No-Marriage' policy for PAL flight attendants was declared void for being discriminatory and contrary to public policy. Employment policies that force women to choose between marriage and their job violate the constitutional guarantee of equal protection.
Digest
No digest has been checked for this case yet. A draft is never shown — read the ruling itself, or write your own digest in the reader.