Valenzona v. People
No confirmed citationJanuary 1, 2024
Study material, not legal advice. Written and checked by the PhilippineLaws team to the best of our knowledge; not reviewed by a lawyer. A digest is a summary — the full decision is the authority, so read it before you cite it.
Don't cite this from here. The docket on file (G.R. No. 250283) could not be matched to any decision in the library, so it is not shown as a citation above. The case may well be real — find the reported citation before you use it.
Cited for
Mala in Se vs. Mala Prohibita
Why it matters
Clarified the distinction between crimes that are wrong by their very nature (mala in se, requiring criminal intent) and crimes that are wrong merely because prohibited by law (mala prohibita, requiring only intent to commit the act). Even in special laws, the element of volition must be proven.
Digest
No digest has been checked for this case yet. A draft is never shown — read the ruling itself, or write your own digest in the reader.