Republic of the Philippines v. Intermediate Appellate Court
Supreme Court
Manila
FIRST DIVISION
G.R. No. L-70513 October 13, 1986
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES,petitioner,
vs.
THE HONORABLE INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT and KENNETH WONG MAN LEUNG alias KIANA SO, also known as KENNETH WONG MAN LEUNG, etc.,respondents.
NARVASA,J.:
In behalf of the Republic, the Solicitor General has appealed from the judgment of the Intermediate Appellate Court
The facts are not in dispute.
Private respondent, hereafter simply referred to as Kenneth, was born in Hongkong on November 3, 1953. He came to the Philippines as a British subject sometime in 1969. He was then known as Wong Man Leung, which is the name set out in his Alien Certificate of Registration
The Solicitor General asserts that both the Juvenile & Domestic Relations Court and the Intermediate Appellate Court erred in approving the change of name because-
1) there was neither allegation nor proof on Kenneth's part of "the name by which he was registered in Hongkong upon his birth," a fatal defect;
2) the evidence failed to show proper and reasonable cause for changing his alleged true name.
The assertions are not persuasive and will be rejected
The Intermediate Appellate Court has correctly ruled that at the time Kenneth filed his petition for change of name, the records of the Local Civil Registrar officially showed his name to be Kenneth Wong Man Leung alias Kiana So, this being the name under which he sought and was granted Filipino citizenship by naturalization pursuant to PD No. 836. His petition did therefore state his real or official name
The finding by the Intermediate Appellate Court that the evidence established sufficient justification for a change of name-i.e., there is a sincere desire on Kenneth's part to adopt a Filipino name to erase signs of his former nationality which will unduly hamper his social and business fife; his change of name will do away with aliases which should be discouraged, apart from the fact that it will avoid confusion and will be "for the. convenience of the world at large in addressing him, or in speaking of or dealing with him
WHEREFORE,the appealed Decision of the Intermediate Appellate Court is affirmed, without pronouncement as to costs.
SO ORDERED.
Yap (Chairman), Melencio-Herrera, Cruz and Feliciano, JJ., concur.
Footnotes
Related decisions
Decisions on similar questions that neither cites the other: they rely on the same precedents, are cited together, or apply the same law.
- L-39326 June 3 v. Republic1976both apply PD 836
- L-34100 June 30 v. Republic1976both apply PD 836
- L-31475 March 24 v. Republic1981both apply PD 836
- L-26323 May 31 v. Philip1976both apply PD 836
- Republic v. Sandiganbayan2023both apply PD 836
- Republic v. Winston Brian Chia Lao and…2020both apply PD 836
- Frivaldo v. COMELEC1996both apply PD 836
Laws it applies
Links and connections are read from the text by pattern matching, not checked by a person. A guide, not a finding.