A.M. No. 233 - Natalio F. Beltran vs. Cornelio R. Magsarili
Manila
SECOND DIVISION
A.M. No. 233 October 28, 1977
NATALIO F. BELTRAN,petitioner,
vs.
CORNELIO R. MAGSARILI,respondent.
R E S O L U T I O N
SANTOS,J.:
This is a petition for disbarment filed by petitioner, Natalio F. Beltran, a member of the Philippine Bar, against respondent, Cornelio Magsarili, also a member of the Philippine Bar, on the ground of gross misconduct unbecoming of a lawyer. Petitioner alleged that respondent" ...deliberately and flagrantly violated,forPURPOSES OF FRAUD and DECEIT,his oath of office as attorney and sub-sections (c) and g Section 19, Rule 127, Rules of Court (of 1940 added), thereby making himself anUNWORTHYMember of the Philippine Bar and, therefore,SUBJECT TO DISBARMENTunder Section 25, Rule 127, Rules of Court (of 1940 added), by this Honorable Courtfor his gross misconduct as attorney, for his willful ignorance and for his deliberate and fraudulent violationsof the rights and interests of the Plaintiffs in the residential lot involved, in (said) CIVIL CAST NO. 1389-P and of the pertinent laws mentioned in this PETITION and involved in CIVIL CASE NO. 1389-P ... ".
It appears from the records that the anomalous activities complained of which were allegedly violative of Rule 127, Sec. 19 (c) and (g) of the Rules of Court of 1940 (now Rule 138, Sec. 20 (c) and g stemmed from Civil Case No. 1389-P, Court of First Instance of Rizal, Seventh Judicial District, Pasig, Rizal. In the decision of that court dated September 26, 1955, it was established that there was little dispute as to the facts that transpired in the case.ℒαwρhi৷It was resolved that the alleged nefarious activities which petitioner herein imputed to have been committed by respondent were in fact legitimate and the sale of the land that had been the subject matter of the above-entitled civil case by the late Felipe del Rosario to spouses, Jose del Rosario and Pilar Magsarili, was a valid transaction and supported by jurisprudence that have been recognized in this jurisdiction.
The inability of the petitioner, Natalio F. Beltran, to submit to this Court a certified copy of said decision of the Court of First Instance in Civil Case No. 1389-P, in compliance with the resolution of this Court dated August 29, 1955
Conformably, the Clerk of court of the court of First Instance of Rizal was required by the Bar Confidant and Deputy Clerk of Court, Attorney Arturo A. de Leon, to furnish this Court with the decision promulgated by Branch II of that Court in Civil Case No. 1389-P, in a letter dated August 4, 1977.
WHEREFORE,let Administrative Case No. 233 beDISMISSEDfor lack of merit, with costs against the complainant-petitioner, Atty. Natalio F. Beltran. Let copy of this Resolution be entered in the records of respondent, Atty. Cornelio R. Magsarili.
Fernando (Chairman), Barredo, Antonio, Aquino and Concepcion Jr., JJ., concur. .
Footnotes