Felix C. Dungca v. Macario Peralta, Jr
Supreme Court
Manila
SECOND DIVISION
G.R. No. L-27437 December 6, 1977
FELIX C. DUNGCApetitioner,
vs.
HON. MACARIO PERALTA, JR., as Secretary of National Defense, GENERAL ALFREDO M. SANTOS, as Chief of Staff of the Armed Forces of the Philippines and BRIG. GENERAL ISMAEL LAPUS, as Commanding General of the Philippine Army,respondents.
AQUINO,J.:
The respondents appealed from the decision of the Court of First Instance of Rizal, Pasig Branch VI, declaring that petitioner Felix C. Dungca, a lieutenant colonel in the Reserve Force of the Philippine Army, is exempted from the operation of sections 1 and 2 of Republic Act No. 2334 and is covered by section I of Republic
Act No. 2334 and is covered by section I of Republic Act No. 1382 and enjoining the respondents from enforcing Special Order No. 118 dated December 5. 1964 and from reverting him to inactive status.
The parties submitted their briefs. The case was submitted for decision on October 17, 1967.
In this Court's resolution of June 17, 1977 the parties were. required to state whether petitioner Dungca is still in the active service and whether the case had become moot and academic. The Solicitor General was directed to make the proper substitution of parties in case it is desired that this case be decided on the merits.
Counsel for Dungca, in his manifestation of July 16, 1977, stated that petitioner was retired from the active service as of June 7, 1972, upon reaching the age of sixty years and completing more than twenty-nine years' service. He was retired with the rank of colonel and given retirement pay based on the base pay and longevity pay of a brigadier general (Par. III, General Orders No. 577, GHQ AFP, dated June 1, 1972).
Petitioner's counsel concluded that the instant case had become moot and academic. The Solicitor General, in his manifestation of November 10, 1977, reached the same conclusion.ℒαwρhi৷
WHEREFORE,this case is dismiss for having become moot and academic. No costs.
SO ORDERED.
Fernando (Chairman), Antonio, Concepcion, Jr. and Santos, JJ., concur.
Barredo, J., took no part.
Related decisions
Decisions on similar questions that neither cites the other: they rely on the same precedents, are cited together, or apply the same law.
- L-29433 May 31 et al.1974both apply Act 1382, Act 2334, RA 1382
- L-33713 July 30 v. Mata1975both apply Act 1382, RA 1382, RA 2334
- L-30255 October 26 v. Mata1973both apply Act 1382, RA 1382, RA 2334
- L-20093 March 31 v. Peralta1965both apply Act 2334, RA 2334
- L-21390 November 18 v. Peralta1967both apply RA 1382, RA 2334
- L-16572 February 27 v. General Headquarters Efficiency and…1965both apply Act 1382, RA 1382
- L-15471 April 29 v. Headquarters1966both apply Act 1382, RA 1382
- L-8243 December 24 v. Municipality of Binalonan1915both apply Act 2334
Laws it applies
- Act 1382An Act Extending the Time for the Payment of the Land Tax in the…1×
- Act 2334An Act Making the Provisions of the Cadastral Act Applicable To…1×
- RA 1382An Act Granting Reserve Officers With At Least Ten Years of Active…1×
- RA 2334An Act Providing for the Rotation of Reserve Officers of the Armed…1×
Links and connections are read from the text by pattern matching, not checked by a person. A guide, not a finding.