Leonor S. Litton, et al. v. B. Jose Castillo, et al.
Supreme Court
Manila
EN BANC
G.R. No. L-35992 February 25, 1975
LEONOR S. LITTON and ROGELIO M. PAZ,petitioners,
vs.
HON. B. JOSE CASTILLO, Provincial Fiscal of Rizal, HON. VICENTE ABAD SANTOS, in his capacity as Secretary of Justice, and GEORGE LITTON, Sr.,respondents.
R E S O L U T I O N
ANTONIO,J.:
Considering that Presidential Decree No. 77 issued by the President of the Republic of the Philippines on December 6, 1972 pursuant to Proclamation No. 1081 dated September 21, 1972, and General Order No. 1 dated September 22, 1972, amending Section I of Republic Act No. 5180 (Prescribing a Uniform System of Preliminary Investigation by Provincial and City Fiscals and their Assistants and by State Attorneys or their Assistants), the validity of which is being questioned in the present petition for certiorari, prohibition and mandamus, now forms part of the law of the land (Article XVII, Section 3[2] of the new Constitution), the Court Resolved to DENY the petition for lack of merit.ℒαwρhi৷
Makalintal, C.J., Barredo, Makasiar, Esguerra, Fernandez and Aquino, JJ., concur.
Castro and Teehankee, JJ., concur in the result.
Muñoz Palma, J., took no part.
Separate Opinions
FERNANDO,J.,concurring:
I concur on the ground of presumptive validity.
Related decisions
Decisions on similar questions that neither cites the other: they rely on the same precedents, are cited together, or apply the same law.
- Opinion et al.1975both apply PD 77, RA 5180
- L-34038 June 18 v. District1976both apply PD 77, RA 5180
- Ledesma v. CA1997both apply PD 77, RA 5180
- Leonardo v. Ang2009both apply PD 77, RA 5180
- Hipos v. Bay2009both apply PD 77, RA 5180
- L-61355 February 18 v. Sandiganbayan1983both apply PD 77, RA 5180
- L-46773 July 16 v. Ong1979both apply PD 77, RA 5180
- En Banc June 23 v. Jusep1987both apply PD 77, RA 5180
Laws it applies
Links and connections are read from the text by pattern matching, not checked by a person. A guide, not a finding.