In Re: Felix Lim.felix Lim v. Republic of the Philippines
Supreme Court
Republic of the Philippines
SUPREME COURT
Manila
EN BANC
G.R. No. L-20804 January 22, 1966
IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION TO BE ADMITTED A CITIZEN OF THE PHILIPPINES.
FELIX LIMaliasLIM ENG PHO,petitioner-appellee,
vs.
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES,oppositor-appellant.
Office of the Solicitor General for the oppositor and appellant.
J.R. Gaboya for the petitioner and appellee.
BENGZON, J.P.,J.:
Felix Lim also known as Lim Eng Pho, a bachelor and a citizen of Nationalist China, was born in Cebu City on June 24, 1939. He completed his primary education at the Cebu Chinese High School (now Cebu Eastern College), and his secondary course at the University of Southern Philippines. On December 21, 1960 he filed with the Court of First Instance of Cebu a petition for naturalization without previously filing a declaration of intention required in Section 5 of the Revised Naturalization Law.
The petition for naturalization having been granted, the City Fiscal of Cebu appealed on two grounds, to wit:
(1) The applicant is not exempt from filing a declaration of intention inasmuch as he failed to prove that be completed his primary education in a school not limited to any race or nationality; and
(2) The applicant has not conducted himself in a proper and irreproachable manner during the entire period of his residence in the Philippines for he used analiasin violation of Commonwealth Act 142.1äwphï1.ñët
One year prior to the filing of the petition for admission to Philippine citizenship, an applicant for Philippine citizenship must file with the Department of Justice a declaration under oath that it is hisbona fideintention to become a citizen of the Philippines.1This requirement is mandatory and failure to comply with the same, unless applicant is exempted under Section 6 of the Revised Naturalization Law, as amended by Commonwealth Act 535, is fatal to the application for naturalization.2Commonwealth Act 535 provides that a person born in the Philippines who has received his primary and secondary education in public schools or those recognized by the Government andnot limited to any race or nationalitymay be naturalized without having to make a declaration of intention.
As stated, the Cebu Chinese High School where applicant Felix Lim completed his primary education is recognized by the Government. No evidence, however, aside from applicant's own testimony, was presented to show that said schoolis not limited to a particular race or nationality. To our mind, his testimony, unsupported by other competent evidence, is inadequate. The burden is on him to present such competent evidence, he being the claimant of the exemption, and since he failed to do so, he cannot be entitled to the exemption sought. And inasmuch as he filed no declaration of intention, his petition for naturalization must be denied.
We deem it unnecessary to resolve the second issue raised by appellant.
Wherefore, the petition for naturalization is denied, thereby reversing the decision appealed from, with costs. So ordered.
Bautista Angelo, Concepcion, Reyes, J.B.L., Barrera, Regala and Zaldivar, JJ., concur.
Bengzon, C.J., Dizon and Makalintal, JJ., took no part.
Footnotes
1Sec. 5, Com. Act 473, as amended.
2Yap vs. Republic, L-12938, July 31, 1961.
Related decisions
Decisions on similar questions that neither cites the other: they rely on the same precedents, are cited together, or apply the same law.
- L-9683 May 30 v. Philip1957both apply CA 142, CA 535
- L-35382 May 30 v. Republic19741 shared precedent · both apply CA 535
- L-77028 November 8 v. CA1988both apply CA 535
- L-5341 December 29 v. Republic1953both apply CA 535
- L-4548 November 26 v. Phili1952both apply CA 535
- L-4404 August 21 v. Republic1952both apply CA 535
- L-3265 November 29 v. Republic1950both apply CA 535
- L-26601 June 30 v. Republic1969both apply CA 535
Laws it applies
Links and connections are read from the text by pattern matching, not checked by a person. A guide, not a finding.