Stewart E. Tait, et al. v. Placido Mapa, et al.
Supreme Court
Republic of the Philippines
SUPREME COURT
Manila
EN BANC
G.R. No. L-13239 March 24, 1961
STEWART E. TAIT, B. H. BERKENKOTTER, W. ICK and ROSE L. HARRIS,plaintiffs-appellees,
vs.
PLACIDO MAPA, J. AMADO ARANETA, MA-AO SUGAR CENTRAL CO, INC. and FINANCING CORPORATION OF THE PHILIPPINES,defendants-appellants.
Ledesma, Puno, Guytingco, Hilado, Antonio & Associates for defendants-appellants.
R E S O L U T I O N
CONCEPCION,J.:
This is an appeal from the decision of the Court of First instance of Manila, the dispositive part of which reads as follows:
WHEREFORE, judgment is hereby rendered against the defendants Placido L. Mapa, J. Amado Araneta, Ma-ao Sugar Central Co., Inc. and Financing Corporation of the Philippines, sentencing them jointly and severally to pay the plaintiffs the following amounts:
(a) S.E. TAIT ......................................................................... | P121,783.94 |
Stephen P. Brankov and Lina Wasserman in substitution of Rose L. Harris ........................................... | 118,786.43 |
Bernard E. Berkenkotter (executor of the estate of B. H. Berkenkotter) and W. Ick .............................................. | 43,837.08 |
with interest thereon at the rate of six (6%) per cent per annum from October 13, 1953 when this suit was filed, until full payment; and | |
(b) Costs of suit. |
This appeal is, however, within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Court of Appeals, for: (1) although the aggregate amount of the foregoing judgment is P284,407.45, this sum includes interest accrued before October 13, 1953, deducting which the total principal awarded would be P150,441.65 only; (2) the appeal raises questions of fact and no question of law which is within the exclusive appellate jurisdiction of this Court; and (3) this case involves three (3) separate causes of actions, one in favor of S. E. Tait, for P64,467.66; another in favor of Rose L. Harris, for P62,910.66; and the third, in favor of H. B. Berkenkotter, jointly with W. Ick, for P23,063.38, all exclusive of interest (Republic Act No. 296, sections 17, as amended by Republic Act No. 2613, and 29; Go Bon Chait vs. Valmarida, L-4605. April 24, 1953; Samson vs. Andal, L-3439, July 31, 1951; A. Soriano y Cia vs. Jose, 47 O.G. Supp., 156; International Colleges, Inc,. vs. Argonza, L-3884, November 29, 1951; Abrasaldo vs. Compania Maritima, G.R. No. L-11918, July 31, 1958; R. C. Pangilinan & Co., Inc. vs. J. Pasicolan, L-13317, April 25, 1960; Cajilig, et al. vs. Co, L-12800, August 5, 1960).
WHEREFORE, the record of this case should be, as it is hereby remanded to the Court of Appeals for disposition, in accordance with law. It is so ordered.
Bengzon, Actg. CJ., Padilla, Bautista, Angelo, Labrador, Reyes, J.B.L., Barrera, Paredes and Dizon, JJ.,concur.
Related decisions
Decisions on similar questions that neither cites the other: they rely on the same precedents, are cited together, or apply the same law.
- L-13579 March 8 v. Mindanao Motor Lines19611 shared precedent · both apply Act 2613, Act 296, RA 2613
- L-34223 December 10 v. Philippine National Bank and the…1982both apply Act 2613, Act 296, RA 2613
- L-28864 November 27 v. Maddela1969both apply Act 2613, Act 296, RA 2613
- L-22488 October 26 v. Ramolete1967both apply Act 2613, Act 296, RA 2613
- L-17624 June 30 v. Masaganda1962both apply Act 2613, Act 296, RA 2613
- L-16934 July 31 v. Cordova1964both apply Act 2613, Act 296, RA 2613
- L-16732 May 29 v. Abing1962both apply Act 2613, Act 296, RA 2613
- L-15566 June 29 v. Aviado1962both apply Act 2613, Act 296, RA 2613
Laws it applies
Links and connections are read from the text by pattern matching, not checked by a person. A guide, not a finding.