United States v. Rafael Cervantes
Supreme Court
Republic of the Philippines
SUPREME COURT
Manila
EN BANC
G.R. No. 1390 January 19, 1904
THE UNITED STATES,complainant-appellant,
vs.
RAFAEL CERVANTES,defendant-appellee.
Office of the Solicitor-General Araneta for appellant.
Claro Reyes for appellee.
ARELLANO,C.J.:
In this case a complainant was filed and proceedings instituted charging the defendant with brigandage, and the court found the facts as proved; but, considering that the acts charged in the complaint are not sustained by the evidence, in that it was not proven that the band of which the accused was a member was organized for the purpose of stealing personal property, as alleged in the complaint, the accused was acquitted without prejudice to a subsequent prosecution upon the facts established by the evidence.
The Solicitor-General calls attention to the testimony of the witness Mateo de la Cruz and Regino de la Paz. The former stated that during the time the band remained in the village they went to every house in search of effects, but did not succeed in taking anything away on account of the prompt arrival of assistance. The other testified as follows: "I know them to be men who come into the villages and take property which does not belong to them;" "they took the chickens that were in the huts of my village;" Thus showing the error of the court below in not finding that the band of which the accused was a member had robbery for its object. In our opinion the court did err in this particular.
Therefore, the facts set forth in the complaint being duly and sufficient proved as constituting the crime of brigandage, which is punished by Act No. 518, according to section 1 of this law we sentence the accused, Rafael Cervantes, to twenty year's imprisonment and the costs and reverse the decision appealed from by the Government. So ordered.
Torres, Cooper, Willard, Mapa, McDonough and Johnson, JJ.,concur.
Related decisions
Decisions on similar questions that neither cites the other: they rely on the same precedents, are cited together, or apply the same law.
- L-6992 August 30 v. Jueves1912both apply Act 518 · Robbery
- L-6003 August 7 v. Ibañez1911both apply Act 518 · Robbery
- L-4222 March 30 v. Cernias1908both apply Act 518 · Robbery
- L-3409 October 3 v. Bustamante1907both apply Act 518 · Robbery
- L-3291 October 29 v. Francisco1906both apply Act 518 · Robbery
- L-2806 August 28 v. Morales1906both apply Act 518 · Robbery
- L-2364 December 15 v. Hernandez1905both apply Act 518 · Robbery
- L-2075 December 20 v. Victor Quiamson Pineda and Escueta…1905both apply Act 518 · Robbery
Laws it applies
Links and connections are read from the text by pattern matching, not checked by a person. A guide, not a finding.