United States v. Juan dela Cruz, et al.
Supreme Court
Republic of the Philippines
SUPREME COURT
Manila
EN BANC
G.R. No. 1478 February 16, 1904
THE UNITED STATES,complainant-appellee,
vs.
JUAN DE LA CRUZ, ET AL.,defendants-appellants.
Geo. W. Lyon for appellants.
Office of the Solicitor-General Araneta for appellee.
MAPA,J.:
The defendants were sentenced in the Court of First Instance to the property of twenty years' imprisonment for the crime of brigandage, punished by section 1 of Act No. 518 of the Commission. The merits of the case demonstrate sufficiently the guilty of the said defendants and justify the sentence for the aforementioned crime.
The amendment to the complaint made before the presentation of the evidence for the defense has not prejudiced, nor could it have prejudiced, any essential rights of the defendants as well because it did not affect the essence of the crime charged, but merely an accidental detail of the same, as because it did not deprive the accused of an opportunity to produce evidence for their defense, if they had desired, in relation to the said amendment; its allowance was not, therefore, a fatal error, as the defense contends, relying upon section 10 of General Orders No. 58.
For the reason stated we affirm the sentence appealed from, imposing the cost of both instances upon the defendants. So ordered.
Arellano, C. J., Torres, Cooper, Willard, McDonough and Johnson, JJ.,concur.
Related decisions
Decisions on similar questions that neither cites the other: they rely on the same precedents, are cited together, or apply the same law.
- L-6992 August 30 v. Jueves1912both apply Act 518 · Robbery
- L-6003 August 7 v. Ibañez1911both apply Act 518 · Robbery
- L-4222 March 30 v. Cernias1908both apply Act 518 · Robbery
- L-3409 October 3 v. Bustamante1907both apply Act 518 · Robbery
- L-3291 October 29 v. Francisco1906both apply Act 518 · Robbery
- L-2806 August 28 v. Morales1906both apply Act 518 · Robbery
- L-2364 December 15 v. Hernandez1905both apply Act 518 · Robbery
- L-2075 December 20 v. Victor Quiamson Pineda and Escueta…1905both apply Act 518 · Robbery
Laws it applies
Links and connections are read from the text by pattern matching, not checked by a person. A guide, not a finding.