United States v. Praxidio Peñoso
Supreme Court
Republic of the Philippines
SUPREME COURT
Manila
EN BANC
G.R. No. 952 January 23, 1903
THE UNITED STATES,complainant-appellee,
vs.
PRAXIDIO PEÑOSO,defendant-appellant.
Francisco Dominguez, for appellant.
Office of the Solicitor-General Araneta, for appellee.
WILLARD,J.:
In the Court of First Instance of Ambos Camarines on the 17th day of January, 1901, the defendant was convicted of the crime of sedition defined in article 8 of Act No. 292. He appealed.
In his brief, filed in this court on November 29, 1902, he asked that he be acquitted, but if the court was of the opinion that this could not be done, then he asked that he be included in the amnesty of July 4, 1902.
Afterwards, and on January 8, 1903, he joined with the Solicitor-General in a petition to the court that he be declared entitled to the benefit of said amnesty.
We are justified, under these circumstances, in not passing upon the merits of the case. (The United Statesvs.Santillana, decided November 10, 1902.)
The offense is clearly included in the amnesty proclamation of July 4, 1902. The acts charged were committed in the month of December, 1901. If proved, they constituted an offense under Act No. 292, section 8 of the Commission. All offenses included in that Act are covered by the amnesty. (The United Statesvs.Abad, decided October 22, 1902.) It is certainly clear that offenses included in section 8 of the Act are so covered.
It is therefore declared that the defendant is entitled to the benefits of the amnesty, and upon his filing in this court the required oath the case shall be dismissed and remanded to the court below with direction that defendant be discharged. So ordered.
Arellano, C.J., Torres, Cooper, and Ladd, JJ.,concur.
Mapa, J.,did not sit in this case.
Related decisions
Decisions on similar questions that neither cites the other: they rely on the same precedents, are cited together, or apply the same law.
- L-7557 December 7 v. Villamor1912both apply Act 292
- L-7038 January 7 v. Calvo1913both apply Act 292
- L-6025 May 30 v. Hernandez1964both apply Act 292
- L-5240 November 19 v. Buanco1909both apply Act 292
- L-2570 March 21 v. Asuncion1906both apply Act 292
- L-2535 August 9 v. Ilustre1906both apply Act 292
- L-2451 February 17 v. Leon Lineses Maximino Mina for…1906both apply Act 292
- L-2430 March 9 v. Juan Leandro Villariño and Eulalio…1906both apply Act 292
Laws it applies
Links and connections are read from the text by pattern matching, not checked by a person. A guide, not a finding.