G.R. No. 1188 - JANUARY 1903 - PHILIPPINE JURISPRUDENCE CASE NUMBERCASE TITLE G.R. No. 1188January 31, 1903 Gabriel Fuster vs. E.F. Johnson G.R. No. 975January 29, 1903 United States vs. Ignacio Dacotan, et al. G.R. No. 931January 27, 1903 Pedro Regalado vs. Felix de los Santos, et al. G.R. No. 865January 24, 1903 United States vs. Felix Balmori G.R. No. 570January 23, 1903 Roberto A. Roa vs. Nicasio Veloso G.R. No. 858January 23, 1903 Francisco Martinez vs. Pedro Martinez G.R. No. 950January 23, 1903 United States vs. Emigdio Mendigoren G.R. No. 952January 23, 1903 United States vs. Praxidio Peñoso G.R. No. 1036January 21, 1903 United States vs. Regino Valencia, et al. G.R. No. 869January 16, 1903 United States vs. Benigno Pascua, et al. G.R. No. 923January 16, 1903 Domingo C. Garcia vs. Emeterio U. Ruiz G.R. No. 1016January 16, 1903 United States vs. Catalino Vergara G.R. No. 930January 10, 1903 United States vs. Basilio Tagle G.R. No. 1118January 10, 1903 Vicente Gonzalez vs. Telesforo Crisanto G.R. No. 1156January 5, 1903 Isabelo de los Reyes vs. Felix M. Roxas G.R. No. 878January 2, 1903 Evaristo Alvarez vs. Leon Montinola, et al. The Lawphil Project - Arellano Law Foundation, Inc. Gabriel Fuster vs. E.F. Johnson United States vs. Ignacio Dacotan, et al. Pedro Regalado vs. Felix de los Santos, et al. United States vs. Felix Balmori Roberto A. Roa vs. Nicasio Veloso Francisco Martinez vs. Pedro Martinez United States vs. Emigdio Mendigoren United States vs. Praxidio Peñoso United States vs. Regino Valencia, et al. United States vs. Benigno Pascua, et al. Domingo C. Garcia vs. Emeterio U. Ruiz United States vs. Catalino Vergara United States vs. Basilio Tagle Vicente Gonzalez vs. Telesforo Crisanto Isabelo de los Reyes vs. Felix M. Roxas Evaristo Alvarez vs. Leon Montinola, et al. The Lawphil Project - Arellano Law Foundation, Inc.
Republic of the Philippines
SUPREME COURT
Manila
EN BANC
G.R. No. 1188 January 31, 1903
GABRIEL FUSTER,petitioner,
vs.
E.F. JOHNSON, judge of first instance of Manila,respondent.
Francisco Dominguez, for petitioner.
E.F. Johnson, respondent.
ARELLANO,C.J.:
The plaintiff has appealed against an order overruling a demurrer in a criminal case and asks that an injunction be issued restraining the judge below from continuing the proceedings until this court passes upon the action ofmandamusbrought against him. The order in question not being appealable under section 24 of the General Orders, No. 58, series of 1900, there is nothing which can prevent the continuation of the case.
The application for an injunction is therefore denied, with costs.
Torres, Cooper, Willard, Mapa, and Ladd, JJ.,concur.