Decisions in Aug 1998
65
Decisions
01
G.R. No. 110067 MA. LINDA T. ALMENDRAS, PETITIONER, VS. THE COURT OF APPEALS, URCICIO TAN PANG ENG AND FABIANA YAP, RESPONDENTS.R E S O L U T I O N
02
G.R. No. 109780 PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, VS. RODOLFO BERNALDEZ @ “DOLFO,” ACCUSED-APPELLANT.D E C I S I O N
03
G.R. No. 109023 RODOLFO S. DE JESUS, EDELWINA DE PARUNGAO, VENUS M. POZON AND OTHER SIMILARLY SITUATED PERSONNEL OF THE LOCAL WATER UTILITIES ADMINISTRATION (LWUA), PETITIONERS, VS. COMMISSION ON AUDIT AND LEONARDO L. JAMORALIN IN HIS CAPACITY AS COA-LWUA CORPORATE AUDITOR RESPONDENTS.DECISION
04
G.R. No. 107234 ALFREDO BONGAR, PETITIONER, VS. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION AND AMA COMPUTER COLLEGE, RESPONDENTS.D E C I S I O N
05
G.R. No. 97903 ELMER F. ESPINA, PETITIONER, VS. COURT OF APPEALS, NATIONAL ELECTRIFICATION ADMINISTRATION, ROMMEL L. MANIKAN, LEYTE IV ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC., BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF LEYTE IV ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC., AND MIGUEL COTIAMCO, RESPONDENTS.D E C I S I O N
06
G.R. No. 96412 ANICETA RAMIREZ, AGUSTIN RAMIREZ, JR., LORNA RAMIREZ, NESTOR RAMIREZ, ROMEO RAMIREZ, CHITO RAMIREZ, PANCHO RAMIREZ, MARLON RAMIREZ, OSCAR RAMIREZ, SPOUSES VICENTE AND BALDOMERA ANIÑON, AND SPOUSES ELMER AND BENG TEE SUNBANUM, PETITIONERS, VS. THE COURT OF APPEALS AND SPOUSES BENEDICTO AND EVANGELINE RAMOS, RESPONDENTS.D E C I S I O N
07
G.R. No. 102786 ALEJANDRO B. DE LA TORRE, PETITIONER, VS. COURT OF APPEALS, AND THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, RESPONDENTS.D E C I S I O N
08
G.R. No. 112535 CINDERELLA MARKETING CORPORATION, PETITIONER, VS. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, SECOND DIVISION, AND JULIO DAET, JOSELITO ARAMBULO,FELINA PAGTALUNAN, MARIETA DAET, EMMA AGUSTIN, GINA CIRIACO, ROSEMARIE TONIO, ELLEN ILEDAN, EMMANUEL LUMBERA, ELIZABETH DELIGOS, CORA VILLA, ALICE FIGURA, GRETHEL GARCIA, EVANGELINE CASAS AND LIGAYA HIDALGO, RESPONDENTS.[G.R. NO. 113758 AUGUST 20, 1998]CINDERELLA MARKETING CORPORATION, PETITIONER, VS. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, SECOND DIVISION, AND AIDA ARNAIZ, MA. ANA ARAMBULO,MAGDALENA CASTILLO, ROWENA CONSTANTINO, JOJO MORILLO, IGNACIO RIMPOS, TERESA ROYECA, EVANGELINE SUMBILLA, LOLITA DE VEGA, FE MANGILIT, IRENE LUNA AND NESTOR GUTIERREZ, RESPONDENTS.RESOLUTION
09
G.R. No. 83974 SPOUSES NARCISO RONGAVILLA AND DOLORES RONGAVILLA, PETITIONERS, VS. COURT OF APPEALS AND MERCEDES DELA CRUZ AND FLORENCIA DELA CRUZ, RESPONDENTS.D E C I S I O N
10
G.R. No. 102084 DE LA SALLE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER AND COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, PETITIONER, VS. HON. BIENVENIDO E. LAGUESMA, UNDERSECRETARY OF LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT; ROLANDO S. DE LA CRUZ, MED-ARBITER REGIONAL OFFICE NO. IV, DE LA SALLE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER AND COLLEGE OF MEDICINE SUPERVISORY UNION-FEDERATION OF FREE WORKERS, RESPONDENTS.D E C I S I O N
11
G.R. No. 111130 LAURA Z. VELASCO, PETITIONER, VS. HON. MANUEL CASACLANG, AS DEPUTY OMBUDSMAN FOR AFP AND COMMISSION ON AUDIT, RESPONDENTS.D E C I S I O N
12
G.R. No. 118944 PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, VS. ROMULO VERSOZA Y GARCIA AND JERRY AVENDAÑO Y MENDOZA, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.D E C I S I O N
13
G.R. No. 121227 VICENTE SAN JOSE, PETITIONER, VS. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION AND OCEAN TERMINAL SERVICES, INC., RESPONDENTS.D E C I S I O N
14
G.R. No. 118973 POLYMART PAPER INDUSTRIES, INC. AND CAYETANO TAGLE, PETITIONERS, VS. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, RICARDO ADVINCULA, LAURENCE MEREN, GERARDO ALCARAZ, NORBERTO DIAVARRA, NELSON MALANA, DANILO PAPA, RICARDO BULAWAN AND ALBERTO LOSALA, RESPONDENTS.D E C I S I O N
15
G.R. No. 120166 DOMINADOR ARAMBULO, PETITIONER, VS. COURT OF APPEALS AND FLORA FLORES, RESPONDENTS.D E C I S I O N
16
G.R. No. 115414 PHILIPPINE TUBERCULOSIS SOCIETY, INC., PETITIONER, VS. NATIONAL LABOR UNION AND NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, RESPONDENTS.D E C I S I O N
17
G.R. No. 114849 PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, VS. ALVIN IGNACIO Y JOCON, ACCUSED-APPELLANT.D E C I S I O N
18
G.R. No. 116751 ORIENTAL TIN CAN LABOR UNION, PETITIONER, VS. SECRETARY OF LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT, ORIENTAL TIN CAN WORKERS UNION – FEDERATION OF FREE WORKERS[OTCWU-FFW]AND ORIENTAL TIN CAN AND METAL SHEET MANUFACTURING, RESPONDENTS.[G.R. NO. 116779. AUGUST 28, 1998]ORIENTAL TIN CAN AND METAL SHEET MANUFACTURING CO., INC., PETITIONER, VS. HON. BIENVENIDO E. LAGUESMA, UNDERSECRETARY OF LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT, ORIENTAL TIN CAN WORKERS UNION – FFW AND ORIENTAL TIN CAN LABOR UNION, RESPONDENTS.D E C I S I O N
19
G.R. No. 118664 JAPAN AIRLINES, PETITIONER, VS. THE COURT OF APPEALS ENRIQUE AGANA, MARIA ANGELA NINA AGANA, ADALIA B. FRANCISCO AND JOSE MIRANDA, RESPONDENTS.D E C I S I O N
20
G.R. No. 119544 PEOPLE OF PHILIPPINES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLE, VS. EDGAR UMADHAY Y TRABASAS, SERGIO UMADHAY Y TRABASAS AND ALBERT UMADHAY Y TRABASAS, ACCUSED-APPELLANTS.DECISION
21
G.R. No. 119121 NATIONAL POWER CORPORATION, PETITIONER, VS. COURT OF APPEALS, FIFTEENTH DIVISION AND PHESCO INCORPORATED, RESPONDENTS.D E C I S I O N
22
G.R. No. 119500 PAGUIO TRANSPORT CORPORATION, PETITIONER, VS. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION AND WILFREDO MELCHOR, RESPONDENTS.D E C I S I O N
23
G.R. No. 123941 RDS TRUCKING[FORMERLY VILL-TRADE TRUCKING]AND/OR REMIGIO S. DE SILVA, PETITIONERS, VS. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION AND CHARLIE A. ALDUS, RESPONDENTS.D E C I S I O N
24
G.R. No. 123318 CITY TRUST BANKING CORPORATION, PETITIONER VS. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, RAMON RAAGAS, CHARLITO LAGDA AND RENATO MEMITA, RESPONDENTS.D E C I S I O N
25
G.R. No. 121671 PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, VS. WILLY MANALILI Y BOLISAY AND DANILO REYES Y MAMNILA, ACCUSED-APPELLANTS.D E C I S I O N
26
G.R. No. 122327 ARTEMIO J. ROMARES, PETITIONER, VS. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION AND PILMICO FOODS CORPORATION, RESPONDENTS.D E C I S I O N
27
G.R. No. 121975 MANILA BROADCASTING COMPANY, PETITIONER, VS. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, HON. RICARDO OLAIREZ AND SAMUEL L. BANGLOY, RESPONDENTS.D E C I S I O N
28
G.R. No. 121879 EMPIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, PETITIONERS, VS. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION AND MONERA ANDAL, RESPONDENTS.D E C I S I O N
29
G.R. No. 121270 ENRICA QUEVADA[*]AND SPOUSES CIRILO AND ANGELINA[**]QUEVADA, PETITIONERS, VS. POMPOSA GLORIOSO AND ESTELITO, MANOLITO AND ADORADO ALL SURNAMED CERRUDOM, AND THE COURT OF APPEALS (TWELFTH DIVISION), RESPONDENTS.D E C I S I O N
30
G.R. No. 124213 PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, VS. DANTE ALFECHE Y TAMPARONG, ALIAS WILLY, AND JOHN DOE, ACCUSED, DANTE ALFECHE Y TAMPARONG, ACCUSED-APPELLANT.D E C I S I O N
31
G.R. No. 123115 PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, VS. NIXON MALAPO, ACCUSED-APPELLANT.D E C I S I O N
32
G.R. No. 123698 ETERNAL GARDENS MEMORIAL PARK CORPORATION, PETITIONER, VS. COURT OF APPEALS AND SPS. LILIA SEVILLA AND JOSE SEELIN, RESPONDENTS.D E C I S I O N
33
G.R. No. 123485 PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, VS. ROLUSAPE SABALONES ALIAS “ROLING,” ARTEMIO TIMOTEO BERONGA, TEODULO ALEGARBES AND EUFEMIO CABANERO, ACCUSED, ROLUSAPE SABALONES ALIAS “ROLING” AND ARTEMIO TIMOTEO BERONGA, ACCUSED-APPELLANTS.D E C I S I O N
34
G.R. No. 123871 ALLIED BANKING CORPORATION, PETITIONER, VS. COURT OF APPEALS AND BANK OF THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS, INC., RESPONDENTS.D E C I S I O N
35
G.R. No. 126921 PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, VS. JOSE MORENO Y CASTOR, ACCUSED-APPELLANT.D E C I S I O N
36
G.R. No. 125704 PHILEX MINING CORPORATION, PETITIONER, VS. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, COURT OF APPEALS, AND THE COURT OF TAX APPEALS, RESPONDENTS.D E C I S I O N
37
G.R. No. 124551 USHIO MARKETING, PETITIONER, VS. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION AND SEVERINO ANTONIO, RESPONDENTS.D E C I S I O N
38
G.R. No. 125937 PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, VS. ROBERTO MOSTRALES, ACCUSED-APPELLANT.D E C I S I O N
39
G.R. No. 126046 THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, VS. ROBERT DARAMAN @ “JOVIT,” EDGARDO LUMENARIAS @ “ALONG,” ELIAS FUENTES (AT LARGE), JESSIE OBLIMA (AT LARGE), ACCUSED, ROBERT DARAMAN @ “JOVIT,” APPELLANT.D E C I S I O N
40
G.R. No. 126699 AYALA CORPORATION, PETITIONER, VS. RAY BURTON DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, RESPONDENT.D E C I S I O N
41
G.R. No. 126425 POLICARPIO NISNISAN AND ERLINDA NISNISAN, PETITIONERS, VS. COURT OF APPEALS, PACITA MANCERA, WENCESLAO MANCERA AND SILVESTRE POLANCOS, RESPONDENTS.D E C I S I O N
42
G.R. No. 125447 MARINA PROPERTIES CORPORATION, PETITIONER, VS. COURT OF APPEALS AND H.L. CARLOS CONSTRUCTION, INC., RESPONDENTS.[G.R. NO. 125475. AUGUST 14, 1998]H.L. CARLOS CONSTRUCTION, INC., PETITIONER, VS. COURT OF APPEALS AND MARINA PROPERTIES CORPORATION, RESPONDENTS.D E C I S I O N
43
G.R. No. 125888 SPOUSES ERNESTO AND EVELYN SICAD, PETITIONERS, VS. COURT OF APPEALS, CATALINO VALDERRAMA, JUDY CRISTINA M. VALDERRAMA AND JESUS ANTONIO VALDERRAMA, RESPONDENTS.DECISION
44
G.R. No. 126673 STRAIT TIMES INC. REPRESENTED BY RAFAEL M. IRIARTE, PETITIONER, VS. COURT OF APPEALS AND REGINO PEÑALOSA, RESPONDENTS.D E C I S I O N
45
G.R. No. 126891 LIM TAY, PETITIONER VS., COURT OF APPEALS, GO FAY AND CO. INC., SY GUIOK, AND THE ESTATE OF ALFONSO LIM, RESPONDENTS.D E C I S I O N
46
G.R. No. 126170 PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, VS. EMMA MAQUILAN, ACCUSED-APPELLANT.R E S O L U T I O N
47
G.R. No. 129718 SANTO TOMAS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL, PETITIONER VS. CESAR ANTONIO Y. SURLA AND EVANGELINE SURLA, RESPONDENTS.D E C I S I O N
48
G.R. No. 127238 COCA-COLA BOTTLERS, PHILS., INC., PETITIONER, VS. DELFIN HINGPIT, GABRIEL FRANCISCO, JR., CECILIO PINAR, JR., ABUNDIO BALATERO, NARITO MANLULUYO, SECERO ZAMORA, MEDARDO GABINES, ENRIQUES BANGALAO, JULITO APAT, SOTERO PANDAN, NELSON UMALI, AND THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, RESPONDENTS.D E C I S I O N
49
G.R. No. 131523 TRAVELAIRE & TOURS CORP. AND/OR CHRISTINE B. OJEDA, PETITIONERS, VS. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION AND NENITA I. MEDELYN, RESPONDENTS.D E C I S I O N
50
G.R. No. 127683 LETICIA P. LIGON, PETITIONER, VS. COURT OF APPEALS AND IGLESIA NI CRISTO, RESPONDENTS.DECISION
51
G.R. No. 131488 ESPIRITA N. ACOSTA, PETITIONER, VS. THE COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, JUDGE GENOVEVA COCHING MARAMBA, IN HER CAPACITY AS PRESIDING JUDGE OF THE MUNICIPAL CIRCUIT TRIAL COURT, SAN FABIAN/SAN JACINTO, PANGASINAN AND RAYMUNDO I. RIVERA, RESPONDENTS.DECISION
52
G.R. No. 132007 SOLAR TEAM ENTERTAINMENT, INC., PETITIONER, VS. HON. HELEN BAUTISTA RICAFORT,IN HER CAPACITY AS PRESIDING JUDGE OF THE REGIONAL TRIAL COURT OF PARAñAQUE, METRO MANILA (BRANCH 260), TEAM IMAGE ENTERTAINMENT, INC., FELIX S. CO, JEFFREY C. CAL, AND KING CUISIA, RESPONDENTS.D E C I S I O N
53
G.R. No. 132655 BF CORPORATION, PETITIONER, VS. EDSA SHANGRI-LA HOTEL AND RESORT, INC., RUFO B. COLAYCO, RUFINO T. SAMANIEGO, CYNTHIA DEL CASTILLO, KUOK KHOON CHEN, AND KUOK KHOON TSEN, RESPONDENTS.DECISION
54
G.R. No. 131077 LEONISA E. SUAREZ, PETITIONER, VS. COMMISSION ON AUDIT, RESPONDENT.DECISION
55
G.R. No. 127997 FELIX VILLANUEVA, PETITIONER, VS. COURT OF APPEALS AND ALMARIO GO MANUEL, RESPONDENTS.DECISION
56
CESAR B. MERIS, COMPLAINANT, VS. JUDGE CARLOS C. OFILADA, RESPONDENT. FRANCISCO R. HERNANDEZ, COMPLAINANT, VS. JUDGE CARLOS C. OFILADA, RESPONDENT.DECISION
57
RE: SUSPENSION OF CLERK OF COURT ROGELIO R. JOBOCO, RTC, BRANCH 16 NAVAL, BILIRAND E C I S I O N
58
OFFICE OF THE COURT ADMINISTRATOR, COMPLAINANT, VS. JUDGE WALERICO B. BUTALID, REGIONAL TRIAL COURT, BRANCH 9, TACLOBAN CITY, RESPONDENT.[ A.M. NO.97-8-242-RTC. AUGUST 5, 1998]RE: REQUEST FOR THE EXPEDITIOUS RESOLUTION OF CIVIL CASE NO. 92-07-117 PENDING AT RTC-BRANCH 9, TACLOBAN CITYDECISION
59
LETICIA G. MATIAS, COMPLAINANT, VS. JUDGE SERGIO A. PLAN, MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT, CAUAYAN, ISABELA, RESPONDENT.D E C I S I O N
60
JOCELYN E. GREFALDEO, COMPLAINANT, VS. JUDGE RICA H. LACSON, PRESIDING JUDGE, MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT, SORSOGON, SORSOGON, RESPONDENT.D E C I S I O N
61
RENATO ALVARO RUPERTO, COMPLAINANT, VS. JUDGE TIRSO F. BANQUERIGO, RESPONDENT.D E C I S I O N
62
MARITES R. MORENO, COMPLAINANT, VS. VILMA A. BRAGAT, CLERK II, 2ND MCTC, DAANBANTAYAN-MEDELLIN, CEBU, RESPONDENT.DECISION
63
FLAVIANO B. CORTES, COMPLAINANT, VS. JUDGE EMERITO M. AGCAOILI, REGIONAL TRIAL COURT, BRANCH 9, APARRI, CAGAYAN, RESPONDENT.D E C I S I O N
64
RUFERTO GUTIERREZ AND MARITESS PASSION, COMPLAINANTS, VS. JUDGE ESTANISLAO S. BELAN, MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT, BIñAN, LAGUNA, RESPONDENT.DECISION
65