Anti-Rape Law
1930 to 2022.

Every enactment, amendment and Supreme Court reading on file for this law, in the order they happened.

3enactments9SC rulings
  1. 1930 EnactmentDec 1930

    Act No. 3815

    Revised Penal Code: Original Rape Provisions Enacted

    The Revised Penal Code (RPC) was enacted, defining rape under Article 335 as a crime against chastity committed through force, intimidation, or when the woman is unconscious or under twelve years of age. Rape was classified as a crime against honor and required the use of a penis against a vagina, with the victim necessarily female.

    Read the full text
  2. 1969 SC rulingJun 1969

    G.R. No. L-26285

    People v. Erinia: Resistance Must Be Constant

    The Supreme Court held that for rape to be established, the victim must show tenacious resistance throughout the entire assault. Passive submission or failure to shout for help could negate the element of force or intimidation, even in violent circumstances.

  3. 1985 SC rulingMar 1985

    G.R. Nos. L-34665-66

    People v. Matrimonio: Sweetheart Defense Established

    The Supreme Court allowed the 'sweetheart defense' where the accused could argue that sexual intercourse was consensual because of a romantic relationship with the victim. This placed the burden on the prosecution to negate the existence of such a relationship.

  4. 1997 EnactmentSep 1997

    RA 8353

    Anti-Rape Law of 1997 Enacted

    Republic Act 8353 radically reformed Philippine rape law by reclassifying rape from a crime against chastity to a crime against persons, expanding the definition to include sexual assault through insertion of objects or body parts, and creating gender-neutral provisions. The law took effect on October 22, 1997.

  5. 2000 SC rulingMar 2000

    G.R. No. 122485

    People v. Mahinay: Hymenal Laceration Not Required

    The Supreme Court definitively held that hymenal laceration or rupture is not an essential element of rape. The slightest penile penetration of the labia or pudendum constitutes carnal knowledge, even without medical evidence of trauma.

  6. 2004 SC rulingAug 2004

    G.R. Nos. 124388-90

    People v. Malones: Resistance Not Required When Intimidated

    The Supreme Court ruled that when intimidation is present, it is not necessary for the victim to physically resist. Moral ascendancy, the victim's age, and the perpetrator's threats may substitute for actual force, especially in cases involving minors or relatives.

  7. 2006 SC rulingJun 2006

    G.R. No. 126148

    People v. Quiñanola: Sweetheart Defense Requires Proof

    The Supreme Court held that the sweetheart defense is an affirmative defense that must be proven by the accused with convincing evidence such as letters, gifts, or testimony from others. Mere assertion of a relationship is insufficient to overcome evidence of rape.

  8. 2006 EnactmentJun 2006

    RA 9346

    Death Penalty Abolished; Rape Penalties Modified

    Republic Act 9346 prohibited the imposition of the death penalty in the Philippines, reducing all death penalty sentences to reclusion perpetua. Qualified rape under Article 266-B, previously punishable by death, was now penalized with reclusion perpetua without eligibility for parole.

  9. 2009 SC rulingFeb 2009

    G.R. No. 182924

    People v. Perez: Delay in Reporting Not Fatal

    The Supreme Court ruled that delay in reporting rape does not undermine the credibility of the victim or indicate fabrication. Fear, trauma, social stigma, and threats from the perpetrator are valid reasons for delayed disclosure, especially when the accused is a family member or authority figure.

  10. 2012 SC rulingMar 2012

    G.R. No. 179948

    People v. Barcela: Marital Rape Recognized

    The Supreme Court affirmed that marriage is not a defense to rape charges. A husband can be prosecuted for raping his wife under Article 266-A when he uses force, threat, or intimidation to compel sexual intercourse without her consent.

  11. 2020 SC rulingJul 2020

    G.R. No. 227363

    People v. Tulagan: Comprehensive Rape Guidelines

    The Supreme Court en banc issued comprehensive guidelines consolidating rape jurisprudence, clarifying the distinctions between rape and sexual assault, prescribing proper designations and penalties, and addressing issues of age determination, relationship qualifications, and proper award of damages.

  12. 2022 SC rulingJan 2022

    G.R. No. 254177

    People v. XXX: Victim's Identity Protection Mandatory

    The Supreme Court reiterated and strengthened protocols for protecting rape victims' identities in all court proceedings and decisions. Use of real names or identifying information violates victims' rights to privacy and dignity, requiring courts to use initials or pseudonyms in all documents.